RSNA 2007: Connecting Radiology
 
Home
Meeting Program
-
Subspecialty Content Brochures
-
Honors
-
Committees
Technical Exhibits
Daily Bulletin
Image Interpretation Session
Certificate of Attendance
Meeting Announcements
Attendance
R&E Foundation
RSNAnet Contributors
Career Connection
Past Meetings
Future Meetings
Newsroom
Advertising Opportunities
RSNA.org
Contact Us


TOOLS
 
  Add to Briefcase
    Print
  View Presentation
    Email Event
PARTICIPANTS
Presenter
Barry Daly MD  
Abstract Co-Author
Clint Sliker MD  
Dawn Zulauf  
Jack Titus MD  
Priti Shah MD  
Mary Ripple  
et al  
  CODE: SSC04-05
  SESSION: Emergency Radiology (Penetrating Injuries, Emergency Care )
  Utility of Whole Body CT Imaging Autopsy in a US State Chief Medical Examiner’s Investigation of Traumatic Death: Initial Experience
 
 
  DATE: Monday, November 26 2007
  START TIME: 11:10 AM
  END TIME: 11:20 AM
  LOCATION: E351



  DISCLOSURES
  B.D. - Nothing to disclose.  
  C.S. - Nothing to disclose.  
  D.Z. - Nothing to disclose.  
  J.T. - Nothing to disclose.  
  P.S. - Nothing to disclose.  
  M.R. - Nothing to disclose.  
  .e.  

 PURPOSE
 
Early studies have suggested a role for high-resolution multi-detector CT (MDCT) imaging autopsy in the forensic investigation of death. Our study evaluated the sensitivity and potential role of MDCT as a replacement for or adjunct to conventional autopsy in the investigation of traumatic accidental or non-accidental death within a U.S. state medical examiner (ME) system.
  
 METHOD AND MATERIALS
 
20 decedents were prospectively investigated with whole body 40-detector row 2D and 3D MDCT (~4,500 images/study) within 24 hours of death following blunt (n=14) or penetrating (n=6; 5 ballistic) trauma. MDCT was interpreted by consensus by 2 radiologists and compared with ME autopsy results for major findings and cause of death. The authors (radiologists and forensic medical examiners) also evaluated the imaging findings as (a) comparable to; (b) a helpful adjunct to; or (c) of no additive value to conventional autopsy.
  
 RESULTS
 
Imaging correctly identified 92 major findings (sensitivity 95.5%) and all 14 causes of death in cases of blunt trauma. These respective figures were 36 (sensitivity 94.7%) and 5 in cases of penetrating trauma. Six major false-negative CT findings included 2 nondisplaced atlanto-occipital subluxations, and lacerations of the bronchus, right heart, ascending aorta, and liver. All 26 major ballistic fragments recovered at autopsy were accurately localized, but 13 known pathways were incompletely or not identified, especially where no fragments remained. MDCT identified 7 major findings (3 cases of air embolism, 3 major fractures, 1 lung laceration) not detected at conventional autopsy. The authors evaluated MDCT findings as (a) comparable to autopsy in 13 cases (all blunt); (b) a helpful adjunct in 6 cases (5 penetrating); and (c) of no additive value in one case.
  
 CONCLUSION
 
Early experience suggests that MDCT imaging autopsy shows promise as a sensitive tool for the detection of major injuries and cause of death after accidental blunt trauma. In non-accidental traumatic death, MDCT can be a valuable adjunct to mandatory autopsy for detection of injuries and ballistics.
  
 CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION
 
MDCT autopsy has potential to replace conventional or enable limited, focused autopsy following fatal accidental blunt trauma.
  
QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS EVENT EMAIL:
   bdaly@umm.edu
   
   
Copyright © 2007 Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
820 Jorie Boulevard, Oak Brook, IL 60523-2251 || (630) 571-2670 || fax (630) 571-7837 || U.S. and Canada: Main (800) 381-6660, Membership (877) RSNA-MEM (776-2636)